Habermas on metaphysical thinking

Following up on this post: While we don’t have to dogmatically follow Habermas, he nonetheless was a key foundation for Wilber on the postmetaphysical. So let’s look at what he means by the kind of metaphysics of which we must go post. One aspect is identity thinking, meaning an originary whole “removed from the dimensions of space and time and abstracted into something first which, as the infinite, stands over and against the world of the finite and forms its basis” (30). There couldn’t be a clearer definition of shentong.

Postmetaphysical Thinking (1992, MIT Press)


About theurj

Also known as theurj. I've contributed some essays to Integral World and co-founded Open Integral blog, now defunct. I continue to participate in Integral Postmetaphysical Spirituality forum.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s