Don’t confirm Garland, period

See this article on Garland’s nomination for the Supreme Corp. Therein a Republican Senator said we should hold up Garland’s nomination unless the Republicans lose the Presidential race in November. Then he urges the Senate to confirm him ASAP because Clinton will likely nominate someone ‘liberal.’ Meaning Garland is really more in line with the Republicans, and given his rulings will likely support Citizens United if it come before the high court again. Garland was a bad pick from the start, apparently just to prove the Republicans were once again being obstructive to the point they’d even block someone who agrees with them. I say no to Garland, period. If Clinton wins the general election then drop Garland. But you see, Clinton is herself a creature of Citizens United and will likely keep him as the nominee.


About theurj

Also known as theurj. I've contributed some essays to Integral World and co-founded Open Integral blog, now defunct. I continue to participate in Integral Postmetaphysical Spirituality forum.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s